‘The implementation of this Agreement is subject to no currently unforeseen budgetary deterioration.’
Now the Government is busily rewriting this. Apparently, the agreement is no longer subject to currently unforeseen budgetary deterioration. Indeed, to even refer to the Government’s clause is now considered to be irresponsible.
‘The department also described as “a red herring” criticisms which have been raised about the so-called “get-out-of-jail” card in the agreement. This states that the implementation of the measures set out in the deal is subject to there being no unforeseen deterioration in the Government’s finances. The Government would follow through on all the commitments in the deal except in very exceptional circumstances such as another major financial crisis, said the department yesterday.’
There is a good reason why the Government is busily rewriting the agreement. For whatever about the ‘unforeseen’ part, there is little doubt that the budgetary situation is deteriorating. And Ministers are getting a bit touchy about this.
The Government is projecting the deficit this year to come in at -11.6 percent – only fractionally lower than last year. Maintaining this level is crucial both economically and politically; slippage would call into question the very premise of Government strategy. .
Slippage 1: In the last few weeks the CSO recorded GDP levels more than €1 billion below the Government’s projections published in December. In addition, on foot of the recent Quarterly Household Report, unemployment figures were revised upwards from – 12.6 percent to 13.4 percent. Out of all this, last year’s deficit has to be revised downwards again –from -11.7 to -11.8 percent; admittedly marginal, but downwards nonetheless.
Slippage 2: After the first three months of this year, the Government is already off-target. By March, tax revenue was -3.6 percent below target, down from February’s undershoot of -1.3 percent. The Government expected tax receipts this year to be €2 billion below last year’s level. In the first quarter alone, tax receipts are already €1.2 billion under target. The slippage is getting slippier.
It’s not just that the Government’s strategy is coming under internal pressure, it’s also getting a wallop of external pressure.
The EU Commission in its most recent statement on Irish public finances has warned the Government that (a) its growth projections are too optimistic, (b) expenditure will over-run, and (c) it will have to engage in ‘additional’ consolidation measures (more spending cuts/tax increases beyond what the Government has already projected). Even if the Government comes in on target, the EU Commission wants Ireland to ‘consolidate’ further to bring down overall debt levels.
The IMF also gives the Government similar warnings and argues that the Government must cut spending even further if it is to bring the deficit below -3% by 2014 (the Maastricht guideline).
The final straw on this deteriorating camel comes from the Central Bank. While much attention was paid to their projection that the economy will return to growth by the second half of the year, some of the fine print was glossed over. Namely, that GDP will be well below the Government’s projections – by nearly 3 percent by 2011 in nominal terms. This will put even more pressure on the deficit.
All this will lead to ‘budgetary deterioration’. How much is hard to say but there are certain symbolic targets. For instance, the Government is projecting a small decline in the deficit this year. If it actually worsens – no matter how much – the optics will be bad. If it goes beyond -12 percent, it will look particularly bad. That this is certainly possible can be seen from the Bank for International Settlement’s projection of a deficit of -12.2 percent for this year.
It is doubtful that such a slide would result in the Government tearing up the agreement if it is accepted (though this cannot be ruled out). But what it would certainly mean is that there would be little chance of reversing any pay cuts in 2011.
No wonder that the Government wants to shift the goalposts of the agreement by redefining ‘deterioration’ as ‘another financial crisis’ (does Quinn count as such a crisis?). They hope that it will take everyone’s mind off the actually existing deterioration and the thin to non-existent chance of any pay claw-back.
It is the ultimate in ostrich-like indifference to the reality around us. The Government may want to find a soft bed of sand to stick its head in – that doesn’t mean we have to.
Michael, excellent analysis. In my opinion the government underestimated the depth of anger amongst public sector workers. This deal was dead from day one as it did not address any of the key issues of the workers. Its time to go back to the drawing board- Seamus
Posted by: Seamus Ryan | April 12, 2010 at 02:23 PM
Interesting to hear Jack O Connor talk of "strategy" as regards this(non)deal.Hasn't the govt.played this one very badly.Could this deal have gone through in December?This would have given the govt. their transformation agenda....and then they could be saying in April 2010 "well the economy isn't really picking up,NAMA,rising unemployment etc time for a pay cut.From their point of view did they do it backwards?
Absolutely nothing in this for those on welfare,revolting
This(non)deal is asking workers who have been singled out for draconian pay-cuts whether they think that the state's current economic policies are entirely spiffing and will bring about economic growth.Tick"yes" if you're with us on this one or "no" if you're agin us.
What about income tax?Is this set in stone,what will happen in Dec 2010?
As Lenin put it what is to be done?
1 A strike of epic proportions(I reckon I could last 3 weeks before hunger sets in but I'm up for it(hope my kids are too!
2 A massive strike in the Tax office supported by the entire TU movement,decimating the tax take(1,2,3 months long)
3Campaign of civil disobedience for non payment of indirect taxation(motor tax,VAT,water charges etc
4 A rent+mortgage strike
5 Every citizen sets up his/her own bank thus guaranteeing their financial stability ..forever.Can this be done?
Posted by: t | April 12, 2010 at 06:40 PM
Oops ..I'm responible for the above post,sorry
Posted by: Fergal | April 12, 2010 at 06:41 PM
Responsible even
Posted by: Fergal | April 12, 2010 at 06:42 PM
Imagine you are captured by bandits who threaten to kill you. After much discussion, they emerge in the middle of the night to announce that they have reached agreement: they won't kill you. They'll only torture you . . . but they reserve the right to kill you if the torture proves unsatisfactory.
By the way, I'm of the view that the gov't knew this deal wouldn't wash and that's how they like it. When it is rejected, the propaganda war, led by the Sindo, will start in earnest and we'll hear nothing for the next 8 months but how those selfish reprobates in the public sector were unwilling to reform and therefore pay cuts are all they deserve, the stiffer the better.
Posted by: Ernie Ball | April 12, 2010 at 09:40 PM
Glad you're back Michael.
Posted by: WorldbyStorm | April 13, 2010 at 08:08 PM
I'm of the view that the gov't knew this deal wouldn't wash and that's how they like it. When it is rejected, the propaganda war, led by the Sindo,
Posted by: NFL Jerseys | August 17, 2010 at 02:05 PM